VLADA SRBIJE NAPRAVILA OD GOTOVOG VERESIJU PO PITANJU KOSOVA – VELIKE ŠANSE SRBIJE U HAGU???

Sa traženjem savetodavnog mišljenja o tome dali je proglašavanje nezavisnog Kosova u skladu sa medjunarodnim pravom, vlada Srbije je učinila od gotovog veliku veresiju, tu šansu Ameriki nije smela dati! Da je secesija bezpravni akt, to dokazuje rezolucija 1244 i tu nije potrebno da neko potvrdjuje taj pravni dokument. Ako većina zemalja ne bude prisutna konferenciji, zašta će se Amerika svim sredstvima boriti da to bude tako, a one zemlje koje ostanu da glasaju o pravnom aktu secesije mogu uz bomoć američkog uticaja da budu u većini i stim bi se samo potvrdilo da Srbija gubi Kosovo a da je rezolucija 1244, na osnovu toga, od drugorazrednog značaja. Vlada je ovim aktom omogućila Americi da na kraju krajeva potvrdi legalnost secesije Kosova i legitimitet svojeg priznavanja Kosova suverenom državom. Ovo je, po mojem, prozirna igra igrača koji su pred bombardovanje Srbije prizivali milosrdnog andjela, zahvaljujući njemu došli na vlast pa su se ovim aktom odužili Amreci jer šta ako se ne nadje većina da potvrdi stav Srbije? Onda će to biti aktuelna situacija stanja na terenu koja ide u prilog Ameriki što bi značilo da je Kosovo i pored rezolucije 1244 i pored dobre volje Rusije izgubljeno. Do sada smo imali medjunarodno pravo sa rezolucijom 1244 na svojoj strani i to nije smela vlada niti po koju cenu da dovodi u pitanje. Sa rezolucijom 1244 je medjunarodno pravo na strani Srbije i tu nije bila potreba da se to još jednom potvrdi. Na primedbu na račun dijaspore mogu reći; da su se isti ti koji su prizivali NATO da bombarduje Srbiju, ostali “milosrdnom andjelu” večiti dužnici jer su uz pomoć njega odnosno milosrdnog andjela došli na vlast pa smo sad tamo gde jesmo. Pobednik oružanog konflikta sigurno nije propustio priliku da na ključne pozicije odlučivanja da postavi sebi poslušno osoblje koje je sve uradilo kako bi se dijaspora neutralisala a u Srbiji radilo po volji svojih “gospodara”. Po mome je ovo najperfidniji i najlicemerniji način odricanja od Kosova u korist pro evropske politike. Ako nebudem u pravu odrećiću se ove svoje internet prezentacije srpske dijaspore, stranice Glasa Dijaspore, u znak izvinjenja!

Dušan Nonković

VREME JE DA TADIC KAZE NARODU SRBIJE – NEMA NISTA OD CLANSTVA U EU . VREME JE DA NAROD KAZE TADICU: DOSTA JE LAGANJA!SPASI SRBIJU- SIDJI S VLASTI

VREME JE DA TADIC KAZE NARODU SRBIJE – NEMA NISTA OD CLANSTVA U EU .
!
VREME JE DA NAROD KAZE TADICU: DOSTA JE LAGANJA!SPASI SRBIJU- SIDJI S VLASTI

http://www.nisnews.nl/public/170908_3.htm

Netherlands Blocks Trade Benefits for Serbia
BRUSSELS, 17/09/08 – The Netherlands, along with Belgium, has blocked the association agreement between Serbia and the EU from coming into effect. This is the result of a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels.

„The condition that Serbia must fully cooperate with the Yugoslavia Tribunal has not yet been fulfilled. Positive steps have been taken, but it is clear that Serbia must make more progress before one can speak of full cooperation,“ said Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen after the meeting.

A large majority of EU countries wanted to reward the Serbian government for the extradition of Radovan Karadzic to the UN Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. But Verhagen referred to an earlier EU meeting in April in which it was agreed that further benefits for Serbia could only come into effect if all 27 EU countries agreed about the full cooperation from the Serbian side with the Tribunal. „And that decision was not made for fun,“ said Verhagen.

The best evidence“ of full cooperation with the Yugoslavia Tribunal would be the arrest of former Bosnian Serb army leader Ratko Mladic, said Verhagen. The minister has the support of the full Lower House in his judgement on Serbia.

The EU ministers decided to send at least 200 observers to Georgia. They will supervise the implementation of the accord between Russia and Georgia brokered by the EU. According to Verhagen, the Netherlands will „make a proportional contribution to the mission.“ The observers must be operational before the end of the month.

INTERVIEW Serbia’s meaningless decisions – By Boba Borojevic

http://www.serbianna.com/columns/borojevic/076.shtml

INTERVIEW
Serbia’s meaningless decisions
By Boba Borojevic
September 16, 2008

If there is a Balkan parallel to the situation that we have in Georgia vs. South Ossetia and Abkhazia, it is the one with Croatia vs. the Krajina.
• The current Serbian Government is “a joint criminal conspiracy which has the objective of stealing public property at home and betraying the nation and the state abroad.”

Georgia’s aggression against South Ossetia and subsequent recognition of independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia by Russia prompted political analysts to make comparisons with the Serbian province of Kosovo and Metohija. Such parallels overstate the case, Srdja Trifkovic, Foreign Affairs Editor of Chronicles magazine and Director of the Rockford Institute’s Center for International Affairs, told CKCU Radio in Ottawa.

“Neither constitutionally nor morally do the Kosovo Albanians have a claim to independence that is equal – let alone more valid – than that of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Unlike Kosovo, both Abkhazia and South Ossetia were autonomous regions that entered the Soviet Union as parts of Georgia only at the time of Georgia’s inclusion in the USSR after a brief period of independence immediately following the Bolshevik Revolution. In other words, their inclusion in the Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic was predicated upon Georgia being a member of that wider entity, that is, the SSSR.”
Secondly, in South Ossetia it was the Georgians who attempted to ethnically cleanse those territories, Tudjman-style, Trifkovic points out:

“When Kosovo Albanians sought independence at the time of Yugoslavia’s disintegration, they acted in a manner that clearly demonstrated their desire to dominate the Province and to expel the Serbs. They had been subjected to a massive campaign of quiet ethnic cleansing under communism, under Tito and his successors, which accelerated with the purchase of Serbian land and violence against the remaining Serbs, and culminated in the aftermath of the NATO bombing in 1999.”

If there is a Balkan parallel between the situation that we have in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, it is the one with Croatia and the Krajina, Trifkovic adds:

“What Georgian President Mikhel Saakashvili tried to do on August 7-8, 2008, was the repeat performance of Franjo Tudjman’s ethnic cleansing of a quarter-million Serbs from the Krajina in August of 1995. The Krajina Serbs faced a US trained and supplied Croatian military on one side and the Milosevic’s regime in Belgrade on the other, that was not only willing to help them but had in fact made prior arrangements with Zagreb to facilitate the speedy collapse of the Krajina. In Saakashvili’s case he faced a determined Russia. If he thought that he could pull it off Tudjman like and that the US would back him up, then he is very stupid or insane.”

Although Kosovo and Georgia crisis could well mean the end of the American world dominance, Trifkovic is of the opinion that America had never been the world’s only power.

“There was only a brief period in-between 1991 and 2000 when other major powers were unable or unwilling to act in the way that would combine their recourses and political weight to counter American unilateralism. This was due to Russia’s weakness, China’s primary focus on economic development, and Europe’s incoherence. That period was known as the American moment of unilateral dominance. In a historical prospective, it was fleeting, as transient as Napoleon’s full dominance over the European continent in 1806-1812, or the German attempt at hegemony under the Kaiser, which quickly produced a countervailing alliance of France, Russia, and finally Great Britain. There is a law of international politics that a power that seeks hegemony will cause the creation of a counterveiling alliance composed of those powers that resist that hegemony.”

In the end, Napoleon faced such an alliance composed of Russia, Prussia, Britain and Austria that defeated him in 1814 and finished the job at Waterloo in 1815. Likewise Germany in 1914-1918. Whether this will happen with the USA in an incremental, non-violent way, or whether the acceptance of this reality in Washington requires a major military defeat, remains to be seen. We see increasingly close relations between Russia and China focused on the Shangai Cooperation Organization; the rise of India, which knows that for many decades the USA has treated Pakistan as its strategic partner in the Indian subcontinent. We see other potential power centers, such as Brazil. Some of European countries are not too happy with the attempt from Washington to expend NATO along the northern shore of the Black Sea or to jeopardize relations with Russia at the time when Europe is hugely dependent on Russia for energy resources.

“It would be in the interest of the United States to accept the principle of multi-polarity, the principle of self-limiting mechanisms in world affairs that act as a global system of checks and balances. With the current state of political forces in Washington it is too much to expect this. Obama would be a global interventionist in the name of politicaly correct notions of enforcing democracy, equality, non-discriminationsm, or any other ideological notion dear to the liberal heart. John McCain would be out-and-out hegemonist-interventionist. He has never seen a US military intervention that he didn’t like or that he did not want to escalate.”

So, is George Bush Starting the Cold War Again? For the USA the Cold War had never stopped, Trifkovic says.

“During the 1990s, the time of Russia’s extreme weakness, they expended NATO, contrary to George Bush the senior’s promise to Gorbachev. We have seen a massive robbery of Russia’s natural resources by the Western multinationals and by their Russian cohorts, the robber barons. We have seen two color-coded revolutions, in Georgia and the Ukraine, which obviously had the long-term geopolitical objective of encircling Russia, squeezing it and forcing into a position of submissive irrelevance, in the end possibly partitioning it as Zbigniew Brzezinski has suggested many a time. What we are witnessing now is simply the beginning of a sustained Russian response to this project, which will heighten the tensions in this new Cold War. It has been in existence for a good many years because of the policies pursued from Washington.”

Is the Serbian Government capable of sensing these changes in the world and is it capable of positioning itself accordingly? Trifkovic believes that it is not:

“The Serbian government is dominated by the Democratic Party (DS) of President Boris Tadic. The DS is not really a political party. It is a criminal conspiracy which has the objective of stealing public property at home and betraying the nation and the state abroad. So, domestically their primary focus is on distributing portfolios that enable them to treat Serbia as a cow to be milked for all it’s worth, so the DS bigwigs can line their pockets. Abroad, they go through the motions of resisting the secession of Kosovo but at the same time not doing anything meaningful to defend the Serbian claim. It absolutely doesn’t matter what happens in Georgia or anywhere else: the Serbian government will repeat its tired old mantra of European integrations and act in the manner that is primarily focused on the interests of the DS nomenclature at home and the Diktat from Washington and Brussels abroad.”

The adoption of the Stabilization and Association Agreement with the EU and the energy agreement with Russia by the Serbian Parliament is anything but a “historic moment” for Serbia. Trifkovic thinks that, whatever Serbia’s Parliament does, with the current distribution of political forces and under the current government such actions cannot have any – let alone “historical significance.” Serbia is not the master of its own destiny. Its Assembly resolutions are as significant vis-à-vis Brussels today, as a decision by the Slovak parliament was vis-a-vis the Third Reich in 1942.

“Let’s be clear once and for all: Serbia will never be a member of the EU, no matter what any government of Serbia does. Secondly, in order to proceed on this elusive and ultimately self-defeating road to “Europe,” Serbia will be asked to accept the culpability for everything that happened in the former Yugoslavia, to accept The Hague Tribunal’s caricature of the wars of Yugoslav secession and to recognize Kosovo as a sovereign and independent state. These demands will be wrapped in the old formula of “normalizing relations with all neighbouring countries.” Even if Serbia does all that, even it accepts the absurd claim that in Srebrenica 8000 Muslims were executed in cold blood , which is rubbish; even it accept that it should pay indemnity and compensation to the victims of Serbia’s “aggression,” it will still not be accepted into the EU. It is irrelevant what the Serbian Parliament voted for, or what the Serbian government does, it will not happen. Not next year, not next decade, but never.”

Serbia not entering the EU is a blessing in disguise, Trifkovic concludes. The EU is a pernicious organization which is geared to the gradual erosion of its members’ sovereignty and the manipulation of hose countries by various means such as we’ve seen with the transformation of the European Constitution into the Lisbon Treaty. Subsequently, the ratification of that Treaty in most countries (Ireland excepted) was pushed through their national assemblies, avoiding the uncertainty presented by referenda.

“It is tragic that Serbia is ruled by a bunch of thieves and traitors, but at least we can console ourselves by the fact that it will not be accepted into the EU. In many ways, not being in the EU is the precondition of a sustained national recovery at a later date.”

ОКРУГЛИ СТО О ПРОДУКТИВНОСТИ 2.10.2008 – Предавач je Милан Нонковић

Догађања

Наредна догађања

2.10.2008
ОКРУГЛИ СТО О ПРОДУКТИВНОСТИ

У овиру реализације Пројекта „Савремена друштвена кретања и статус новинарске професије“ (који подржава и суфинансира Покрајински секретаријат за информације) одржаће се Округли сто на тему: „Медији и имплементација продуктивности у привреди Војводине по програму WCP – светске класе продуктивности“.

Скуп ће се одржати 2. октобра у Центру за привредно-технолошки развој Војводине на Андревљу. Очекује се присуство потпредседнице Извршног већа АП Војводине и Покрајинског секретара за информације Ане Томанове-Маканове, представника регионалних привредних комора Војводине, Синдиката и пре свега новинара, уредника привредених рубрика којима је тема и намењена.

Предавач је Милан Нонковић, члан Међународне, мреже експерата – Светска класа продуктивности (WCP), признати и доказани експерт за ову тему, који ће новинаре – уреднике привредних рубрика, информисати о значају, резултатима и могућностима развоја продуктивности у нашој привреди сходно Кјото декларацији о продуктивности из 1990. године и Пројекта ИВ АПВ из 2007. године. Обраћање предавача биће документовано бројним занимљивим фото и видео прилозима из теорије и праксе.

Указивањем на изузетан значај и могућности развоја продуктивности кроз Пројекат и медије подстакнуће се привредници, представници органа власти, асоцијација и друге одговорне институције у укупном развоју Покрајине. На тај начин даће се допринос у стварању квалитетнијег функционисања новинара у оквиру савремених кретања у друштву.

NVO AKADEMSKA ALTERNATIVA

NVO AKADEMSKA ALTERNATIVA

Izjava za javnost Vojina Grubača, predsjednika NVO Akademska alternativa

Podgorica, utorak, 16. septembar 2008. godine

Prilicno ostra reakcija Bosnjackog savjeta, po pitanju krupnog sovinistickog incidenta prema Bosnjacima zabiljezenog na prijemnom ispitu za Policijsku akademiju, je apsolutno opravdana i adekvatna ozbiljnosti problema. Medjutim, ubijedjeni smo da na tom prijemnom ispitu nijesu bili sikanirani samo pripadnici bosnjackog, vec i drugih naroda koje vlast u Crnoj Gori periodicno ili stalno posmatra kao remetilacki faktor ili „nepodobne narode“.

Zato, vec drugi put javno pozivamo ministra policije Jusufa Kalamperovica da objelodani etnicku strukturu policije i ANB, da bi javnost mogla da ocijeni da li je ta etnicka struktura u skladu sa jasnim ustavnim obavezama o adekvatnoj nacionalnoj proporciji. Smatramo da je poslije korektne i logicne intervencije Bosnjackog savjeta neophodno da se predostavi i etnicka struktura polaznika Policijske akademije od pocetka njenog rada.

NVO AA je i ranije upozoravala javnost da u drzavnoj administraciji Crne Gore burla paranoidni crnogorski sovinizam, od kojeg nije postedjena policija i ANB. Glavni njegovi promoteri su ekstremisticki orjentisani visoki drzavni sluzbenici kojima etnicka ciscenja administracije i drzavnih sluzbi izgledaju kao oblik „patriotske obaveze“ prema drzavi, ne shvatajuci da se radi o teskom krivicnom djelu.

Upravo zato, NVO Akademska alternativa podrzava zahtjev Bosnjackog savjeta za ponistenjem prijemnog ispita na Policijskoj akademiji, smjenu odgovornih i sankcionisanje diskriminatorskog ponasanja ekstremisticki orjentisanih cinovnika te ustanove. Ujedno, pozivamo zastitnike ljudskih prava i politicare kojima su usta puna demokratije, multietnicnosti i evropskih standarda, da se suoce i suprotstave ociglednom drzavnom ekstremizmu u jasnom usponu i razmah

KOSOVO JE SRPSKO – ORILO SE BERLINOM – GLAS JAVNOSTI – Foto, SAŠA MIŠKOVIĆ

September 17, 2008

Kosovo je srpsko – ori se Berlinom – Piše Glas Javnosti

KÖLN/ANTWERPEN/WIEN

Newsletter vom 17.09.2008 – Europa der Rechtsextremisten (II)

KÖLN/ANTWERPEN/WIEN (Eigener Bericht) – Mit einem internationalen
Kongress in Köln festigen Parteien der extremen Rechten aus mehreren
EU-Staaten am kommenden Wochenende ihre Zusammenarbeit. Ziel sei
„mittelfristig“ die Gründung einer „europäischen Rechtspartei“,
kündigt der Vorsitzende der Organisation „Pro Köln“ an, die den
Kongress veranstaltet. Beteiligt sind unter anderem Parteien aus
Belgien (Vlaams Belang), Österreich (FPÖ) und Italien (Lega Nord). Die
europäische Rechtspartei, deren deutscher Ableger noch nicht endgültig
feststeht – auch die NPD ist im Gespräch -, soll in Zukunft für das
Europaparlament kandidieren und dort eine eigene Fraktion bilden. Im
Zentrum der Kampagnenführung steht der Kampf gegen den Islam. Dabei
nutzen die Beteiligten Ressentiments, die auch außerhalb traditionell
rechtsextremer Milieus verbreitet sind und im aktuellen
„Anti-Terror-Kampf“ stark geschürt werden; diese ließen sich seitens
der neu entstehenden Rechtspartei „möglicherweise in einen Wahlerfolg
ummünzen“, warnt der Rechtsextremismus-Experte Alexander Häusler im
Gespräch mit german-foreign-policy.com. Die neue, künftig in ganz
Europa aktive Struktur basiert auf alten Traditionen der Kollaboration
mit NS-Deutschland.

mehr
http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/de/fulltext/57335

Kroatien und seine Faschisten ( Hrvatska i njeni fašisti)

http://www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/995/305960/text/

HIMNA DIJASPORE – parodija, prosledila Prof. Dr. Stojanka Aleksić

HIMNA DIJASPORE

TAMO ‚VAMO

Zbog onoga tamo
dosli smo ovamo.
oni sto su tamo
isto bi ovamo.

Znaju oni tamo,
bolje je ovamo.
Jeste lijepo tamo
ljepse no ovamo,
ali nema tamo
sta ima ovamo.

Ne moze se tamo
isto sto i ‚vamo.
Mi bi radje tamo
no da smo ovamo,
jer nase je tamo
a tudze ovamo.

Ovi bi ovamo
htjeli da smo tamo.
briga njih ovamo
kako nam je tamo.

Trpimo ovamo,
sto ne bismo tamo.
Tako je ovamo.
Oni misle tamo,
blago nama ‚vamo,
kada nismo tamo.

Svi hoce ovamo.
Niko ne bi tamo.
Kada bi svi ovamo,
ko bi onda tamo?
Ko nas posla ‚vamo,
ostao bi tamo
jer ne smije ovamo.

A njemu je tamo
bolje no
ovamo,
pa onima tamo
neda vise ‚vamo.
Trebaju mu tamo.
sta ce svi ovamo?
Neko mora tamo.
Dosta nas je ‚vamo.

Tako ti je tamo.
Placemo ovamo
za onima tamo.
Al ’suze su ‚vamo
krupnije no tamo.
Svako ko je ‚vamo
ima nekog tamo,
pa nas je ovamo,
pa odlazi tamo,
muci se ovamo
da pomogne tamo.

Glavom je ovamo
a srcem je tamo.
Sve bi dao ‚vamo
da je bolje tamo
i ceka ovamo
kad je bolje tamo,
da napusti ‚vamo
da se skrasi tamo.

Hladno je ovamo.
Nije kao tamo,
jer sunce ovamo
ne grije ko tamo
izblijedi ovamo.
Stran im dodjes tamo,
Ko sto si i ‚vamo.

Blago onim ‚tamo
sto nisu ovamo,
no su samo tamo
jer mi smo ovamo
ni ‚vamo ni tamo.