KRAJ RADIKALA?

KRAJ RADIKALA?

Pravi momenat za Tomislava Nikolica da napusti Srpski Radikalnu Stranku (SRS) je bio jos prosle godine kada je iz haske celije bio blokiran prethodno postignuti dogovor sa Demokratskom strankom Srbije da se ide u dvojnu koaliciju, sto je imalo katastrofani ishod.

Centralna otadžbinska uprava Srpske radikalne stranke „jednoglasno“ je u petak, 12. septembra, izbacila doskorašnjeg zamenika predsednika Tomislava Nikoliæa i sve funkcionere koji ga podržavaju zbog pokušaja da „uništi stranku i izmeni njenu ideologiju pod izgovorom da je reformiše i modernizuje“. Sa svoje strane, Nikoliæ je posle burne sednice rekao da misli da je „porastao centimetar, dva“, pošto je odbacio teret koji je ovih dana nosio. Posle rasprave u kojoj su se mogle èuti teške optužbe pa i psovke, Nikoliæ je posle sat i po vremena zajedno sa svojim pristalicama (njih dvadesetak) napustio sednicu.

Razlog Nikolicevog konacnog raskida sa Vojislavom Seseljom je jasan: njemu je “pukao film” usled stalnih intervencija Seselja iz haske celije. Sit je “Seseljevog upornog komandovanja strankom na nacin koji produbljuje razdor i unutrasnje nepoverenje medju ljudima i ne dopusta onima koji stranku de facto vode vec punih pet godina, a to su pre svega Tomislav Nikolic i Aleksandar Vucic, da samostalno odlucuju o kljucnim pitanjima njene buducnosti”, kaze za radio CKCU 93.1 FM u Otavi dr Srdja Trifkovic, spoljnopolicki urednik americkog casopisa Kronikle. Rascep je bio na pomolu i ranije, kaze on:

“To smo videli i maja prosle godine kada je na pomolu bila koalicija izmedju Srpske radikalne stranke (SRS) i Demokratske stranke Srbije (DSS), kao i u prolece ove godine, kada je Nikolic bio zatecen odlukom Seselja da – cak i pre nego sto je za to Nikolic saznao – najavi pristanak Radikala da Vojislav Kostunica ostane premijer i posle izbora.”

Tokom petoipogodisnjeg perioda od Seseljevog odlaska u Hag, Nikolic je kao trezven srpski domacin smirenog nastupa uspeo da SRS-u pridobije veliki broj biraca u Srbiji. To je imalo odraza i na njegovom relativnom uspehu na predsednickim izborima u februaru mesecu, kada je dobio skoro 49 posto glasova, dok je u vreme kada je Seselj odlazio u Hag nivo podrske radikalima je bio negde oko 12 posto. Nikolicev nastup i politika skoro su ucetvorostrucili podrsku radikalima u srpskom birackom telu, sto je Seselju kao sujetnom i svojeglavom coveku naviklom na bespogovornu poslusnost ocigledno smetalo. On je jos na predsednickim izborima u junu 2004. godine znatno otezao polozaj Nikolicu kad je izjavio pred Haskim sudom, da i dalje stoji ne samo iza ideologije “Velike Srbije” vec i plana da zapadna srpska granica bude na liniji Karlobag-Karlovac-Virovitica. To je vec tada Nikolica kostalo, neki procenjuju, izmedju 3i 5 posto glasova na izborim za koji su usledili dva dana kasnije.

Seseljeva privatna stranka

Vojislav Seselj je SRS vazda smatrao za svoju privatnu prciju u kojoj je on gazda, koji ljudima izdaje naloge i koji bezpogovorno od njih ocekuje izvrsenje tih naloga. Njegov kolericni temperament, njegova autokratska licnost kombinovana sa neminovnim izmenama psihickog stanja ljudi koji sede u zatvorkoj celiji vec punih pet godina, doveli su do nemogucnosti nastavka dosadasnjeg stanja. Srbiji jeste potrebna jedna cvrsta masovna stranka na patriotskoj strani politicke jednacine, ali sa Seseljem koji iz zatvorske celije pokusava mikro-menadzment te stranke, situacija je odavno postala neodrziva.

Smatram da je Nikolic postupio ispravno. On ce sada da osnuje svoju sopstvenu stranku, pa cemo ubrzo imati prilike da vidimo da li ice vise srece i politickog uspeha imati Seseljevi radikali predvodjeni covekom njegovog temperamentalnog i mentalnog sklopa a na terenu zastupljeni Draganom Todorovicem ili Gordanom Pop-Lazic, ili Nikoliceva stranka koja ce u krajnjoj liniji biti nastavak one linije koju je on sam olicavao u proteklih pet godina.

Marginalizovana opozicija

Srpska opozicija je u ovom skupstinskom sastavu odjednom marginalizovana, nakon sto je napravljen salto mortale Dacicevih socijalista. Stoga bi svaka promena u opoziciji bila promena na bolje. Posto unutar SRS vec mesecima pa i godinama postoje nepremostive koncepcijske i strateske razlike koje otezavaju artikulisanje jednog ozbiljnog fronta otpora ovoj skaradnoj vlasti, bolje je da dodje do rasciscavanja na opozicionoj sceni, do artikulisanja jasnih i biracima lako protumacivih politickih opcija, a ne da imamo vecitu neprevidljivost: sta ce Seselj da kaze?

Ta nepredvidljivost je ocigledno dosla do izrazaja sa nalogom radikalima da glasaju protiv ratifikacije Sporazuma o saradnji i prdidruzivanju EU, cak i nakon sto je amandman kojim se insistira na suverenitetu Srbije na KiM bio usvojen. Naravno, to je irelevantno za Evropsku Uniju koja se ni najmanje ne obazire na to sta srpska skupstina usvaja i sa kakvim amandmanima: Brislem smatra da je taj Sporazum nepodlozan ma kakvim promenama i modifikacijama. Ali na domacem terenu to jeste znacajno. Nema nacina da jedna ozbiljna stranka adekvatno funkcionise ukoliko njen lider – koji nije fizicki prisutan i ne ucestvuje u jednom iole normalnom diskursu sa svojim saradnicima – donosi ad hoc odluke koje moraju da budu bezpogovorno ispostovane, cak i onda kada iziskuju pravljenje zaokreta od180 stepeni i skakanje samom sebi u usta. To u ovom trenutku Tomislav Nikolic sebi vise nije mogao da dopusti. Granica njegove trpeljivosti bila je prekoracena, zakljucio je Trifkovic.

BOBA BOROJEVIC

=======
Boba Borojevic

USIP (a joint USA-Albanian venture of depredation of Serbia)

Serving the Servia’s Servility

by Dušan Vukotić


USIP (a joint USA-Albanian venture of depredation of Serbia)

Daniel Serwer is the one of the main figures inside the US Institute for Peace [or War(!), if you like]. In February 2003 Serwer said that „the final status (of Kosovo and Metohia) will require predetermined guarantees for minorities, for Kosovo’s neighbors, and Bosnia“. A year later (2004), USIP held a meeting of its Balkans Working Group, where they discussed „the future of Serbia“. In fact, the two of the USIP specialists, Daniel Serwer and Ylber Bajraktari (a Kosovo Albanian, canvassed by the USA intelligence service, long before the U.S. aggression against Serbia) paved the path to the following conclusions, regarding the Serbia’s political and economical „re-integration“ into the „society of normal people“:

  • Ensuring Serbia’s pursuance of political and economic reforms;
  • Requiring Serbia’s full cooperation with the Hague tribunal;
  • Encouraging Serbia’s constructive and full cooperation in the region;
  • Supporting Serbia’s civil society and independent media; and
  • Assisting Serbia with increased, but targeted, trade, investment, and commerce.

Of course, the above USIP „analysis“ showed all the sinister aspects of a „special“ treatment, which was carefully prepared for the Serbian leadership, the Serbian state and its people in general. There is no need to be a political or an economical expert to understand what was the meaning of „political and economic reforms“ [farther incapacitation of the Serbian industrial-economic-financial potentials, through the criminal selling of assets, factories and industrial plants], “ full cooperation with the Hague tribunal“ [a constant „excuse“ of the West for the cruelest (permanent) punishing of Serbia and the Serbian people, rarely seen in the former history of NATO suppression of a single, helpless, and ‚outlawed‘ state], „supporting Serbia’s civil society and independent media“ [a unique experiment of the whole-nation mind obliteration and de-Serbization of Serbia] and „assisting Serbia with increased, but targeted, trade, investment, and commerce“ [in this case „targeted“ means „to assist in further colonization and enslaving of Serbia’s people and its economy“].


The eternal damnation or eternal bliss

The whole philosophy of the West towards/against the Serbs could be expressed in a short, single ominous sentence: Kosovo Isn’t the Problem, Serbia Is . In reality, USA and EU are doing all what they can to prevent the Russia’s „breakthrough“ into the Balkans. In addition, the only way that Russians could regain their influence in the south of Europe is to use Serbian soil as a „springboard“ for the further „advancement“ into the “heart” of Europe. Through the centuries Russia was a respected Imperium on a global military and political agenda, and, with a present constant rising of its economy and military might, Russia is on a good way to retrieve all the attributes of a hefty world power, which might be soon matched with that of the former Soviet Union. It is hard to tell, will the Serbian political vassals (who have been recently installed by the West) be able to understand the weariness (toothlessness) of the Western policy and the new fresh „uplifting winds“ of the „eastern shores“ (Russia, China)? The Serbian leaders of today should know they have been blessed with a rare historical opportunity to make the Serbs be a proud, appreciated, and fruitful nation again. If they use their lifetime chance in favor of their country, they will enter into eternity and their names will be engraved, with the golden letters by the new (alive and still to be born), young generations of Serbs.

Unavailing „whine“ of Willy Wimmer

Eight years ago, a Bundestag member, Willy Wimmer, wrote a letter to the then German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder. Under the point 8. of his above-mentioned letter, Wimmer wrote: Dazu müsse Polen nach Norden und Süden mit demokratischen Staaten als Nachbarn umgeben werden, Rumänien und Bulgarien die Landesverbindung zur Türkei sicherstellen, Serbien (wohl zwecks Sicherstellung einer US-Militärpräsenz) auf Dauer aus der europäischen Entwicklung ausgeklammert werden. [For this reason, Poland must be flanked to the north and to the south with democratic neighbor states, while Romania and Bulgaria are to secure a land connection with Turkey. Serbia (probably for the purposes of securing an unhindered US military presence) must be permanently excluded from European development.

Probably, it would be difficult to find such autistic (even idiotic) people like Serbs. It doesn’t matter if you say them that the gallows are mounted for them; they wouldn’t believe it until the noose tightened/broke their neck. Everyone who knows how the Western policy is functioning is aware that nothing can be changed overnight in their political agenda, especially when the Western objectives against Slavic countries are in question.
In case of the Serbs [seen by the „international community“, i.e. USA and its satellites, as „bad guys“ and „genocidal people“] nothing will be changed in a few next decades. The dissolution of Serbia was planned long time ago; when the US Congress founded the National Endowment for Democracy. One of the NED „creators“, Allen Weinstein said to the Washington Post (Sept 21, 1991): „A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA

The Russian Federation as the only way out

Unfortunately, in the CIA „aged“ plans Serbia still plays a very significant role. Although it is not easy to say what is the reason that the Serbs and their country are under the merciless attacks and watchful surveillance of the declining, but still most powerful Empire on Earth – USA(!). We could suppose that something „big“ is on stake; oil paths, gas arrangements [energy resources], the Serbian Orthodoxy [similarity with the Russians], the geostrategic position of the Serbian land at the crossroads of the East and the West, an impact of the two similar but incompatible civilizations [cultural animosity], etc. Everyone knows that small countries are doomed to be dependent on the will of the great powers, and, while the world was a bipolar balance of mutual terror, former Yugoslavia was effectively protected from any outside menace. Today, the times of a new world „polarization“ are „assailing“ the „international community“ very quickly and Serbia must be ready for the moment of an inevitable and final “countdown“.
From time to time, the EU venomous tongues are hurting the Serbian wounds with salty licks that Serbs „should/must accept the fait accompli“. Namely, EU politicians are just parroting the words of their roaring and bullying „big brother“ – „there is no help after the damage has been inflicted“ and „what’s done is done!” The former German ambassador to Serbia, Andreas Zobel, told the Serbs, in a distinct manner, that the further fragmentation of Serbia is more than a certain destiny (Voivodina, Sandžak) – which was precisely planned beforehand by the Euro-Atlantic Serbo-cide vultures.
When all the above mentioned arguments are taken in a serious argumentation, any intelligent man will see that there is only one chance for Serbs to overcome the threats of the NATO killers, and that chance is a sensible strengthening of the Serbian ties (both economically and militarily) with the Russian Federation.

NARODE SRBIJE DOKLE ĆE MO DA SE RASTURAMO, DOKLE ĆE MO DOZVOLJAVATI DA ANTI DRŽAVNI ELEMENTI VRŠLJAJU PO DRŽAVI KAKO HOĆE!?

i anti-Srbi idu dalje (dole aktuelno)

Status Pokrajine

Vojvodina dobija vladu, ministarstva i pravo na predstavništva u

inostranstvu

Izvršno veće Vojvodine ubuduće bi trebalo da se zove Vlada Vojvodine Foto Beta

Nosilac izvršne vlasti na teritoriji Vojvodine je Vlada Autonomne Pokrajine Vojvodine koju čine predsednik, jedan ili više potpredsednika i pokrajinski ministri, navodi se u Radnom tekstu za prednacrt Statuta AP Vojvodine u koji su novinari „Politike” imali uvid. Radni tekst za prednacrt Statuta, Demokratska stranka i Savez vojvođanskih Mađara uputilisu na usaglašavanje koalicionim partnerima u Skupštini Vojvodine.

„Politika” prenosi delove iz dokumenta koji sadrži 71 član, a pisan je na 30 strana.

U Osnovnim odredbama, u članu 1, Vojvodina se definiše kao „autonomna pokrajina građanki i građana koji u njoj žive, u sastavu Republike Srbije, nastala na osnovu posebnih nacionalnih, istorijskih, kulturnih i drugih svojstava ovog područja, kao višenacionalna, višekulturalna i višekonfesionalna demokratska evropska regija, integrisana u evropski poredak. APV je autonomna ,teritorijalna zajednica u Republici Srbiji”.

Što se tiče teritorijalne autonomije, u članu 3, navedeno je da se teritorija APV sastoji od geografskih oblasti: Bačke, Banata i Srema, te da se „teritorija APV ne može menjati bez saglasnosti njenih građana izražene na referendumu”, a za promenu je potrebna „većina od ukupnog broja birača upisanih na teritoriji APV”.

Predviđa se nacionalna ravnopravnost Srba, Mađara, Slovaka, Hrvata, Crnogoraca, Rumuna, Roma, Bunjevaca i Rusina i drugih brojčano manjih zajednica koje u njoj žive.

Glavni grad je Novi Sad, a Vojvodina ima simbole: grb i zastavu, a izgledi upotrebu tih simbola uređuje Skupština APV pokrajinskom zakonskom odlukom.

Prednacrtom Statuta predviđeno je da se imovina APV utvrđuje Statutom i zakonom, te da Skupština svojim aktom određuje svoje organe nadležne za njeno upravljanje i raspolaganje.

U članu 16 – „Međunarodni odnosi”, navodi se da APV „zaključuje međunarodne ugovore u oblastima iz svoje nadležnosti, da može biti član evropskih i svetskih udruženja regiona, da može osnovati predstavništva u inostranstvu radipromocije i unapređenja svojih privrednih, naučnih, obrazovnih, kulturnih i turističkih kapaciteta”.

U članu 19, među pravnim aktima koje APV može da donosi, nalaze se i pokrajinske zakonske odluke. Predlog za donošenje pokrajinske zakonske odluke mogu podneti Vlada APV, najmanje pet poslanika, skupštinske jedinice lokalne samouprave ili najmanje 30 000 birača. Najmanje toliki broj birača može da zatraži i raspisivanje referenduma o pojedinim pitanjima u nadležnosti APV.

AP Vojvodina je nadležna za obavljanje sledećih poslova: prostorno planiranje, regionalni razvoj, poljoprivredu, ruralni razvoj vodoprivredu, šumarstvo, lov i ribolov, turizam, ugostiteljstvo, banje i lečilišta, zaštitu životne sredine, industriju i zanatstvo, drumski, rečni i železnički saobraćaj i uređivanje puteva, priređivanje sajmova i drugih privrednih manifestacija, prosvetu, sport i kulturu, nauku, inovacije i tehnološki razvoj, zdravstvo i socijalnu zaštitu, javno informisanje na pokrajinskom nivou (između ostalog, „osniva javnu radiodifuznu ustanovu” AP Vojvodine), razvoj infrastrukture i kapitalna ulaganja i drugim oblastima.

Učlanu 14. navedeno je da je AP Vojvodina nadležna za, kada je reč o ostvarivanju ljudskihprava, službenu upotrebu jezika i pisma, saradnju sa crkvama i verskim zajednicama, da predlaže mrežu sudova na teritoriji APV, sudije u državna veća… i druge izvorne ili poverene nadležnosti.

Predviđeno je formiranje šest pokrajinskih upravnih okruga: na teritoriji Bačke u Subotici i Somboru, na teritoriji Banata u Kikindi, Vršcu i Zrenjaninu, na teritoriji Srema u Sremskoj Mitrovici.

Najviše predstavničko telo je Skupština sa 120 poslanika. Predviđeno je da se ustanovljava savet nacionalnih zajednica, kao posebno telo Skupštine koje ima 30 članova. Polovina saveta se bira iz redova poslanika „koji se izjašnjavaju kao pripadnici nacionalne zajednice koji čine većinu u ukupnom broju stanovnika APV”, a druga polovina se bira srazmerno ukupnom broju pripadnika poslanika iz manjih nacionalnih zajednica.

Pokrajinski ministar ne može biti narodni poslanik, odbornik u lokalnoj samoupravi, niti član Vlade RS ili izvršnog organa u lokalnoj samoupravi. Skupština bira i razrešava Pokrajinsku vladu većinom glasova od ukupnog broja poslanika. Glasanje o nepoverenju Pokrajinskoj vladi ili pojedinom njenom članu može da zatraži najmanje 30 poslanika.

U Statutu se potvrđuje da budžet APV iznosi najmanje sedam odsto uodnosu na budžet Republike Srbije, te da se tri sedmine budžeta APV koriste za finansiranje kapitalnih rashoda.

Predlog za promenu Statuta mogu podneti: najmanje jedna trećina od ukupnog broja poslanika, Pokrajinska vlada i radno telo Skupštine nadležno za pitanja ustavnopravnog položaja APV i najmanje 40.000 birača. O predlogu za promenu odlučuje Skupština dvotrećinskom većinom od ukupnog broja poslanika. Statut stupa na snagu danom proglašenja u Skupštini.

Demokratska stranka Srbije, Nova Srbija i Srpska radikalna stranka kritikovali su najave da će Vojvodina dobiti svoju vladu i ministarstva, jer smatraju da time, kao i pravom na donošenje zakona, Vojvodina dobija obeležja državnosti, odnosno da ona novim Statutom dobija zakonodavnu, izvršnu i sudsku vlast.

T. D.

[objavljeno: 13/09/2008]

Sta srpska stampa krije od Srbije: Od 8 hiljada na nekih 375 dokazanih… (sitnica)!?

Sta srpska stampa krije od Srbije: Od 8 hiljada na nekih 375 dokazanih… (sitnica)

THE SO-CALLED “GENOCIDE” IN SREBRENICA

takozvani masakr u Srebrenici
The Tribunal found that the Bosnian war was “genocide” in its judgment against Bosnian-Serb general Radislav Kristic [in 2001] for crimes in Srebrenica.
I put the term “genocide” in quotation marks because the Tribunal changed the definition of the word so that they could use it in reference to Srebrenica.
Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide defines genocide as “the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.”63

Clan 2 Convencije o kaznjavanju kriminalnog dela „genocida“ kako je definisan „sa namerom da se unisti – potpuno ili delimicno, nacionalna pripadnost, etnicka grupa, rasna ili religiozna grupa tako definisana“.
Genocide is a crime of intent, yet The Hague Tribunal concluded that: “the existence of a plan or policy is not a legal ingredient of the crime of genocide.”64

Genocid je delikt stvoren sa jasnom namerom, ali ipak tribunal u Hagu odlucuje da „postojanje plana ili uputstava nije dovoljno samo po sebi da bi se cvrsto ustanovio genocid“ 64

The logical question that arises is this: How can you prove that genocidal intent existed when you can’t show that a genocidal plan or policy existed?

Logicno pitanje bi bilo: Kako dokazati genocid bez dokazivanja unpred planiranog pokreta ili politicki jasne platforme.

In Srebrenica there is no evidence of a genocidal plan. The Tribunal found that “the record contains no statements by members of the VRS [Bosnian-Serb Army] Main Staff indicating that the killing of the Bosnian Muslim men was motivated by genocidal intent to destroy the Bosnian Muslims of Srebrenica.”65

U slucaju Srebrenice takvi dokazi nisu podneseni Tribunalu, koji se slozio da izjavi „nama prilozeni dokumenti ne ukljucuju dokumente koji bi nesumnjivo ukazali da je postojala ustaljena politika etnickog ciscenja bosanskih Muslimana u Srebrenici“

What the Tribunal failed to adequately explain was why the Bosnian-Serb military sent Srebrenica’s women and children to safety, if their objective was to “destroy all the Bosnian Muslims of Srebrenica.” If genocide, the physical destruction of the ethnic group, was the Bosnian-Serb objective in Srebrenica, then why would they mostly limit the killing to military-aged men?

U gore pomenutmo „nedostatku materija“ Hag se ne osvrce na fakat da je vojska Republike Srpske uklonila van opasnosti veliki broj zena i dece“ – to se nikako ne moze sloziti sa idejom „genocida“.
The Bosnian-Serb military’s decision to transfer, rather than to kill, the Muslim women and children in Srebrenica undermines the Tribunal’s finding of genocidal intent. It is completely at odds with the sort of killing that has characterized all previously recognized instances of modern genocide…Any war can be called “genocide” if you use the ridiculous definition that has been concocted for Srebrenica.
VENGEANCE: AN ALTERNATIVE MOTIVE
Although “genocide” did not occur in Srebrenica, there is evidence that some Muslim POWs were executed.
Osveta umesto genocida (kao tema):
Iako je dokazano da genocid nije postojao, ocigledno je ukazano da su akcije vojske RS uklonile mnogo zena i dece van opasnosti.
Srebrenica was supposed to be a UN Safe Area, but the UN never demilitarized the enclave. The 28th Division of the Muslim army was stationed there under the command of Nasir Oric, a convicted war criminal before the ICTY.68 [The conviction, which carried a sentence of two years time served, was overturned this summer.]
In 1995 Bill Schiller of the Toronto Star interviewed Oric and was shown videos filmed by his troops in and around Srebrenica.
Schiller wrote that he sat in Oric’s living room watching a video of what might have been called “Nasir Oric’s Greatest Hits”. There were burning houses, dead bodies, severed heads, and people fleeing. Schiller wrote, “Oric grinned throughout, admiring his handiwork.”
“We ambushed them,” Oric said when a number of dead Serbs appeared on the screen. The next sequence of bodies had been done in by explosives: “We launched those guys to the moon,” he boasted.
According to Schiller’s recollection, when footage of a bullet-marked ghost town appeared without any visible bodies, Oric hastened to announce: “We killed 114 Serbs there.”69
Naser Oric javno izjavljuje da „smo ubili 114 Srba u toku svojih akcija. Ovo je potvrdio i kanadski general Phiippe Morillon tokom svedocenja u sudjenu Slobodana Milosevica.
The former UN Protection Force commander in Bosnia, General Philippe Morillon, testified about Oric during Slobodan Milosevic’s trial in The Hague.
Morillon described one meeting he had with Oric, saying: “Naser Oric was a warlord who reigned by terror in his area and over the population itself…According to my recollection, he didn’t even look for an excuse. It was simply a statement: One can’t be bothered with prisoners.”70

Morillon izjavljuje: „po Oricevim recima „nije mogao da se batrga sa zarobljenicima“ te je bilo lakse pobiti ih“.
Morillon described Srebrenica as a “hellish circle of revenge.” He said that Oric “engaged in attacks [on Serbs] during Orthodox holidays and destroyed villages, massacring all the inhabitants. This created a degree of hatred that was quite extraordinary in the region.”71

Morillon dalje izjavljuje: „Srebrenica je bio zacarani krug nasilja, Srbi su cesto bivali napadnuti u doba svojih pravoslavnih praznika, sela popaljena, crkve unistene. To je doprinelo abnormalnom nivou mrznje sa obe strane“.
The presiding trial judge asked Morillon point-blank: “Are you saying, then, General, that what happened in 1995 was a direct reaction to what Naser Oric did to the Serbs two years before?” Morillon responded, “Yes. Yes, Your Honour. I am convinced of that.”72
Morillon je to izjavio u toku svedocenja cak i kad ga je predsedavajuci sudija upitao direktno „da li je po vasem misljenju uzajamna mrznja bila povod netrpeljivosti izmedju te dve etnicke grupe“ – na sta je Morillon potvrdno odgovorio.

Genocide is “the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”. Revenge is an entirely different matter, because the intent is to kill those who have wronged you, not to exterminate an ethnic group.
Another indicator that revenge — not genocide — motivated killings was videotape that surfaced at the Milosevic trial on June 1, 2005. The video was played in open court by the prosecution but was never entered into evidence because the prosecution could not authenticate it.
The video showed six men, identified by the prosecutor as Muslims from Srebrenica, being executed by men whom the prosecutor claimed were a Serb unit called the Skorpions. One of the victims can be heard on the video asking his executioner to wait, but the response that he got was, “When you were killing Serbs you didn’t wait.”
If the prosecutor is correct, and the victims were in fact Muslims from Srebrenica, then it is proof that the men executed on the tape were killed because they were thought to have killed Serbs, not because they were Muslims.

Video snimak gde je zarobljeni Musliman trazio od Srba da „sacekaju“ dobio je odgovor – ni ti nisi cekao dok su ubijao Srbe – sto govori da ova osoba likvidirana zato sto je utvrdjeno da je ucestvovao u ubistvima Srba a ne zato sto je Musliman. To pobija tvrdnje o genocidu.
THE EXAGGERATED TOLL OF THE SREBRENICA MASSACRE

NADUVANIH 8000 ZRTVI U SREBRENCI:
According to any number of Western press reports, the Bosnian-Serb Army executed 8,000 Muslim men and boys from Srebrenica.
Ako je verovati zapadnoj stampi Vojska Republike Srpske je pobila 8000 muslimanski muskaraca i decaka.

Ovaj broj od 8000 zrtvi potice od Crvenog Krsta, uz naznaku da 8000 Muslimana iz Srebrenice nedostaje, nakon sto je vojska RS zauzela Srebrenicu 1995te.
The number 8,000 comes from an International Red Cross (ICRC) report stating that 8,000 Srebrenica Muslims were missing after the Bosnian Serbs took the Srebrenica enclave in July 1995. The media jumped to the conclusion that the Serbs must have executed all 8,000 of these missing Muslims.

Mediji su odmah (i bez provere) zakljucili da je ovih 8000 Muslimana zlodelo Srba. Hronoloski gledano Crveni Krst je dobio zahteve za 10,000 ljudi od kojih se oko 2000 upita odnosilo na istu osobu.
The ICRC’s report states that “After the fall of the enclave, the ICRC received over 10,000 requests for family news from civilians who were transferred to Tuzla in central Bosnia. About 2,000 of these requests were from different family members seeking the same individuals. An in-depth analysis has shown that the remaining 8,000 requests fall into two categories: about 5,000 concern individuals who apparently fled the enclave before it fell, while the remaining 3,000 relate to persons reportedly arrested by the Bosnian-Serb forces.”73

To znaci da se od cifre od 8000 ljudi svodimo na dve kategorije: jedna od oko 5000 upita za one koji su napustili Srebrenicu pre ulaska srpske vojske, sto nam ostavlja oko 3000 ljudi za koje se tvrdi da su uhapseni od strane Srba.
Three thousand of the missing were arrested by the Bosnian Serbs and 5,000 were gone before the Serbs got there. Furthermore, analysis of OSCE [Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe] voter registration records has shown that 3,016 of the “missing” Muslims turned out to vote in Bosnia’s 1996 elections — 16 months after they were supposed to have been “executed” by the Serbs.74

Da ponovimo, znaci 5000 ljudi je napustilo Srebrenicu pre nego sto su Srbi usli, zatim imamo podatke da je nekih 3016 (od tih nedostalih Muslimana) glasalo u izborima 1996te – 16 meseci nakon sto su morali biti pobijeni.
Evidence presented by the ICTY prosecution, nine years after the fall of Srebrenica (in 2004), showed that 2,541 bodies had been exhumed from mass graves around Srebrenica.75

Podatci kriminalnog suda ukazuju da je iskopano nekih 2541 ostataka u okolini Srebrenice.
According to the testimony of Dean Manning, an Australian forensic expert commissioned by the ICTY prosecution to compile a report on Srebrenica, 1,175 of the exhumed corpses had died of gunshot wounds, 67 died from shrapnel wounds or blast injuries, 11 died from a combination of gunshot and shrapnel, and the cause of death was undetermined for the remainder of the bodies.76

Od te grupe iskopanih leseva, nekih 1175 je umrlo od rana iz puscane municije, a 67 od shrapnela, dok je 11 umrlo od kombinacije oba tipa rana.
According to Manning’s report, 390 ligatures and cloth blindfolds were dug up from the graves.77

Izvestaj Gospodina Manning-a ukazuje da je bilo oko 390 ljudi sa vezanim ocima.
Going by the forensic evidence alone, one can assert that about 2,500 persons from Srebrenica lost their lives and out of that total at least 390 were executed. The claim that 8,000 people were executed lacks evidential foundation.

Sudeci po izvestajima obdukcije od oko 2500 poginulih osoba iz Srebrenice, samo oko 390 je umrlo od prostrelnih rana.
Writing in Canada’s Globe and Mail newspaper, Gen. Lewis Mackenzie, the former commander of the UN Protection Force in Bosnia, stated that: “Evidence given at The Hague war crimes tribunal casts serious doubt on the figure of ‘up to’ 8,000 Bosnian Muslims massacred. That figure includes ‘up to’ 5,000 who have been classified as missing. More than 2,000 bodies have been recovered in and around Srebrenica, and they include victims of the three years of intense fighting in the area. The math just doesn’t support the scale of 8,000 killed.”78
General Lewis Mackenzie, jedan od komandanata trupa UN, je izjavio da ozbiljno sumnja u 8000 mrtvih – tvrdeci da je takva cifra matematicki neizvodljiva.
While it is undoubtedly true that some of the Muslims from Srebrenica were executed, there is no indication that the numbers even begin to approach the scale alleged.
A fact that goes almost completely unreported is that the fighting in Srebrenica was provoked by a Muslim attack on the Bosnian-Serb Army…In paragraph 77 of its August 2, 2001, judgment in the Radislav Kristic trial, The Hague Tribunal acknowledged that “a percentage of the bodies in the gravesites examined may have been of men killed in combat.”
MUSLIM ATTACK PRECIPITATED MASSACRE
As Manning’s report noted, several of the corpses exhumed from around Srebrenica died from shrapnel wounds and blast injuries which would be consistent with death in combat, but not death by execution. Death by gunshot is also possible in combat, but does not preclude the possibility of an execution as death by shrapnel wounds or blast injuries does.
On July 10-11, 1995, approximately 15,000 Muslim men and boys from Srebrenica, under orders from the Muslim Army, mobilized and set out to break through the Bosnian-Serb lines towards Tuzla. The group was a mixture of soldiers and male civilians; some had weapons and military training while others didn’t.79
When this group attempted to force its way through the confrontation line they encountered fierce resistance from the Bosnian-Serb Army. The Serbs defended their position and started shelling the column of men advancing against them from Srebrenica.
The men and boys in that column were sent like lambs to the slaughter by the Muslim authorities. Most made it all the way through to Tuzla, but others weren’t as lucky. It is difficult to say how all of those people died. Some died fighting with a rifle in their hands; others were caught in the crossfire; some committed suicide to escape the horrible situation they were in; and some were captured and executed.
Without a doubt, the Muslim authorities bear the greatest responsibility for what happened at Srebrenica. They abused Srebrenica’s status as a UN Safe Area by using it as a military base to attack the Bosnian Serbs.
The Muslim authorities deliberately provoked the Bosnian Serbs to go into Srebrenica. Two weeks before Srebrenica fell, the Muslims attacked a small, undefended Serbian village near Srebrenica. At 4:30 AM on June 26, 1995, Muslim forces from Srebrenica attacked the Serb village of Visnjica, burning houses, killing livestock, and forcing Serbian civilians to flee for their lives.80
Then, once the Muslims had the Serbs good and angry, they sent a poorly trained and poorly equipped group of 15,000 men and boys from Srebrenica to attack the Bosnian-Serb front line.
The Muslims wanted their people to get slaughtered so that they could portray themselves as victims and give NATO a justification to attack the Bosnian Serbs. The existence of this plan is no secret; the Muslims themselves freely admit that it existed.
In 1998 Hakija Meholjic, the Muslim police chief in Srebrenica during the war, gave an interview to the Sarajevo newspaper Dani. He said that Izetbegovic told him during a meeting in September 1993: “You know, I was offered by Clinton in April that the (Serbian) Chetnik forces enter Srebrenica, carry out a slaughter of 5,000 Muslims, and then there will be a military intervention.”81 [Hakija also told “a Dutch TV station that Clinton had promised Izetbegovic NATO military intervention against the Serbs as far back as 1993 if at least 5,000 Muslims could be killed in Srebrenica.”]
Sefer Halilovic, the chief-of-staff of the Muslim armed forces during the war, admitted during his testimony at The Hague Tribunal that Izetbegovic’s regime intentionally abandoned the Srebrenica Muslims. He said, “the command of the 2nd Corps and the General Staff knew when the operation on Srebrenica started, but from a series of testimonies, the people who were in Srebrenica, both from military and political structures, we can clearly see that they asked for help, both of the command of the 2nd Corps and the command of the General Staff and President Izetbegovic, but that they did not receive that assistance…”82
Ibran Mustafic, a founding member of Izetbegovic’s SDA party, a member of the Bosnian parliament, and a resident of Srebrenica, told the July 14, 1996, issue of the Slobodna Bosna newspaper that: “[The] scenario for the betrayal of Srebrenica was consciously prepared. Unfortunately, the Bosnian presidency and the Army command were involved in this business; if you want the names, figure it out yourself. I understood the situation in Srebrenica and, you can trust me on this, had I not been prevented by a group of criminals, many more inhabitants of Srebrenica would be alive today. Had I received an order to attack the Serb army from the demilitarized zone, I would have rejected to carry out that order without thinking and would have asked the person who had issued that order to bring his family to Srebrenica so that I can give him a gun and let him stage attacks from the demilitarized zone. I knew that such shameful, calculated moves were leading my people to a catastrophe. The orders came from Sarajevo and Kakanj.”83
In 2005 former US Assistant Secretary of State Richard Holbrooke told the Sarajevo broadcaster TV Hyatt that “As far as Srebrenica goes, Srebrenica is, uh… is a great tragedy which should not have been permitted to occur. But it did and I tell you that I was under initial instructions to sacrifice Srebrenica, Gorazde and Zepa and I felt that was wrong.”84 Holbrooke later admitted to the domovina.net website that his instructions to “sacrifice Srebrenica” had come from Clinton’s national security advisor Anthony Lake.
So there we have it. Izetbegovic’s regime collaborated with NATO to create conditions for a slaughter in Srebrenica to justify NATO’s attack against the Bosnian Serbs.
It may seem unconscionable that somebody could deliberately put his own people in a position to be slaughtered, but Alija Izetbegovic’s philosophy was that “For all Muslims there is but one solution: to continue to fight, to strengthen and broaden [Islam], from day to day, from year to year, no matter the victims and no matter the time.”85
NON-SERB UNIT EXECUTED SREBRENICA MUSLIMS
It is interesting to note that non-Serbs carried out a large share of the executions of Srebrenica Muslims.
Drazen Erdemovic, the only individual to be prosecuted by The Hague Tribunal for directly participating in the execution of Muslims from Srebrenica isn’t even a Serb. He’s a Bosnian Croat.86
According to Erdemovic, his unit was predominantly made up of non-Serbs. Testifying at The Hague Tribunal, he said, “I joined a unit that later came to be known as the 10th Sabotage unit or detachment, which consisted of eight to ten soldiers, most of whom were Croats. There was one Muslim and one Slovene. I joined that unit I think in April of 1994, and this unit belonged to the army of Republika Srpska.”87
The Serbian government of Slobodan Milosevic led the way in the criminal prosecution of those responsible for the executions of Srebrenica Muslims.
In March of 1996 Erdemovic was arrested by police in Novi Sad, Serbia, 10 days after entering Serbian territory from Croatia. He was charged with the execution of Muslims from Srebrenica and sent to prison.88
The Serbian authorities charged Erdemovic with war crimes against the civilian population under Article 142, paragraph 1 of the Penal Code of Yugoslavia. Had he stood trial in Serbia he would have faced at least 20 years in prison and possibly the death penalty, but The Hague Tribunal came to his rescue and protected him from any real punishment.
The following is an exchange between Milosevic and Erdemovic, who was testifying as a prosecution witness, at The Hague Tribunal:89
MILOSEVIC: Mr. Erdemovic, you were not tried by Yugoslav courts for this act [the killings], but your extradition was requested. You know that. Isn’t that right?
ERDEMOVIC: Yes.
MILOSEVIC: And that is how you arrived here [at The Hague Tribunal] and you were put on trial here; is that right?
ERDEMOVIC: Yes.
MILOSEVIC: Precisely for the act as it is described in the criminal report and the request for the conduct of an investigation issued by the Yugoslav authorities; is that right?
ERDEMOVIC: Yes.
MILOSEVIC: As far as I have been able to see from these documents, you yourself confessed that you personally had killed about 100 men; is that right?
ERDEMOVIC: Yes.
MILOSEVIC: But the total was about 1,200, according to this report. You said 1,000 a moment ago.
ERDEMOVIC: Yes. I said between 1,000 and 1,200.
MILOSEVIC: And is it beyond dispute that for killing more than a thousand men and for personally killing about 100 men you were sentenced to a prison term of five years? Is that right?
ERDEMOVIC: Yes.
[…]
MILOSEVIC: Tell me, how much time did you spend in prison altogether for all these acts you were charged with and condemned for?
ERDEMOVIC: I can’t remember.
MILOSEVIC: You didn’t even spend a full five years, did you?
ERDEMOVIC: No. But that wasn’t a decision taken by the Prosecution to release me. In fact, the Prosecution opposed my early release from prison, but the President of the Tribunal, Judge McDonald, decided that I should be released earlier.

The Srebrenica genocide hoax is one of many replays of anti-Serb propaganda — which we can witness even today as the U.S. helps Greater Albania wrest Kosovo from a sovereign state — serving the counterintuitively aligned interests of Western manipulators and Greater Islam.
Days after the fall of Srebrenica, on July 17, 1995, Karadzic adviser Jovan Zametica issued the following statement:

Over the past few days the international media, aided and abetted by the Muslim authorities, have indulged in an orgy of uncritical reporting concerning the events in Srebrenica. Allegations of torture, murder, rape, and deportation of Muslim civilians are made repeatedly without any independent verification. The truth is that none of these things have happened. UNPROFOR has been on the ground in Srebrenica throughout, and it can testify to the fact that the Muslim civilian population was treated well by the Serbs. Moreover, stories that the civilians were “driven out” are completely false, since their evacuation was agreed in advance with the representatives of Muslim civilian authorities. They themselves requested evacuation because of the fear of the Serbs returning to their homes in Srebrenica — given that the Muslims have in the past committed appalling atrocities against Serb civilians in the region. The aim of Muslim propaganda is to cover up the fact that the Muslim authorities are deliberately worsening the plight of their own people, manipulating world opinion and attempting to draw the international community as an active participant on their side in this conflict.

Please note that the claim of Serbs “driving Muslim civilians out” of Srebrenica is being recycled yet again in the current rash of Western-swallowed and regurgitated propaganda in the midst of the Karadzic capture.
A year before Srebrenica fell, Radovan Karadzic wrote the following desperate letter to UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros Ghali in reference to the notorious “Serbian Siege of Sarajevo”: