OVU VLADU TREBA SMENITI ALI NE U PRVOJ LINIJI ZBOG HAPŠENJA KARADŽIĆA VEĆ ZBOG SARADNJE SA SUDOM KOJI KOOPERIRA SA TERORISTIMA I ZLOČINCIMA NAJ CRNJE SORTE

Da je ova vlada po više pitanja zaslužila da bude u što kraćem roku smenjena nema niti naj manje dileme samo je pitanje kako!? Sa spontanim protestima mladih ozlojedjenog srca to sigurno neće biti moguće. Još manje ima izgleda da se to postigne emocijalnim i ne profesionalnim ispadima koji se mogu razumeti ali i pored toga ostaju apsolutno kontraproduktivni kako po svoju stranku tako i po cilj rušenja vlade. Dovici sa svih strana sveta i izlivi saveta koji do čiste emocije ne doprinose ničemu dobromu već samo do zamajavanje ogorčenih mladih aktivista i stvaranja lažne nade. Možda je to sve opravdano pa i čak potrebno kao sigurnosni ventil kako nebi došlo do do eksplozije koja nebi donela ništa do besmislenih žrtava. Tu pomaže samo trezvena organizacija sa dobro odmerenim i proračunatim koracima koji vode do cilja. Dugo se čekalo, zamajavalo obračunavajući se sa pogrešnim protivnicima, pogrešnim namerama bez i jole pragmatičnih analiza sa ciljem otkrivanja uzroka i posledica. Mnogo je proteklo vremena zemljom srbijom i dok se izmedju sebe batinalo „milosrdni andjeo“ je postavljao na sva važnija mesta i sve važnije skretnice političkog života sebi lojano osoblje. Sad je vriska velika i biće i veća ako se ono malo političkih vodja ne osvesti i počne da radi svoj posao proračunato, pragmatično u interesu svojeg naroda i samo svojeg naroda. Pri tome se mora poći od uzroka od onoga što je uslovilo i dovelo do ove situacije u kojoj se Srbija nalazi. Uzrok sigurno nisu bile etničke razlike niti šarenilo raznoraznih religija ovog područja već je istinski uzrok bila zloupotreba u interesu kreiranja globalizacije sa svim ovim posledicama koje su u stvari na svijem putu realizacije svoga cilja zloupotrebili kako veru tako i diferencije meddju narodima i manjinama na području bivše Jugoslavije ( niko me neće na ovome svetu ubediti da su se ljudi različitih vera i manjina iz mržne ženili odnosno sklapali brakove kao što je to bio slučaj u Sarajevu gde sje živelo po trećinu srba hrvata i muslimana a i jedna trećina mešanih bračnih parova). Svako im je sredstvo bilo prihvatljivo samo da bi ostvarili tu svoju takozvanu globalizaciju (pa makar i provociranjem mržnje) u stvari drugo ime za kolonialno podčinjavanje. Od samog početka razbivanja Jugoslavije počelo se sa satanizacijom Srbije kako bi sve republike okrenuli protiv naj veće republike a to je bila Srbija, kako po brojnosti stanovnika tako i po veličini njene teritorije, kako bi slomili kičmu Jugoslaviji. Historijska je istina da se pri tome nisu birala sredstva. Izvozilo se oružje istočne nemačke( tada po naoružanju šesta armija sveta) koje je dobila zapadna nemačka po ujedinjenju kao miraz pa ga je eksportovala u krizna područja, što su tada bila i Hrvatska i Bosna i to pored toga što im to sobstveni ustav zabranjuje. Poštovanje prava je samo za druge bila obaveza kao što su to na kraju otvoreno dokazali priznavajući nezakonitu samoprozvanu državu Kosovo, puštajući na slobodu teroriste i zločince i.t.d.

Da bi se prestalo sa ovom praksom morale bi opozicione stranke u prvom redu urediti sviju kuću i oćistiti je od stetnih i licemernih elemenata koji svijim, promišljenim ili ne promišljenim programima i parolama rade u interesu svioga političkog protivnoka a stim u ruke „milosrdnog andjela“. Svoji postupci moraju biti proračunati i tako organizovani kako se nebi suludno prolila krv. Svetu se mora dokazati da neprijatelj nije narod koji se medjusobno iztrebljava, koji kroz medjusobne konflikte omogućava protivniku politiku zavadi pa vladaj i.t.d. već da je Srbiji i svetu neprijatelj onaj koji teži da u svetu stvori još stotinu žarišta po uzoru na Kosovo kako bi zavadio i vladao. Treba svetu razjasniti da je za ovu situaciju i onu koja dolazi kriv onaj koji nasilno podiže vojne baze na tudjim teritorijama i to bez da se pita narod. Baze su im potrebne kako na Kosovu tako i Čehoslovačkoj i Poljskoj kako bi bili spremni da podržu vojnim sredstvima kad se počne sa politikom zavadi pa vladaj u cilju takozvane globalizacije kako bi se domogli do ruskog gasa i nafte za koju će se u budućnosti voditi bitka. Da takvo obrazloženje nema niti jedna stranka Srbije pokazuje da sa tim strankama nije nešto u redu. Sve dok vode politiku beziranu na provincijalnim kvazi argumentima gde se uvek neka grupa našeg naroda okrivljuje a pravi uzrok sa svim tim negativnim posledicama po naš narod ne spominje radi se u interesu „milosrdnog andjela“ odnosno u korist kreatora svetske politike koja ne ide u korist srpskom narodu. Sa medjusobnom tučom treba prestati jer služi i ide svome dušmanu u koristi umesto medjusobne tuče treba krenuti pametno i organizovano i po mogićnosti do poslednjeg koraka proračunato protiv stvarnog neprijatelja srpskog naroda. Agitatore ne promišljenog nasilja treba sa oprezom posmatrati i nikad izgubiti iz vida da su politički dezitenti bili i biće predmet posebne pažnje CIA, tadašnjeg i sadašnjeg vrbovanja tadašnjeg i sadašnjeg neprijatelja srpskog naroda. Onog koji po naj više bubnja na ne promišljenu akciju koja je od samog početka osudjena na propast treba se posebno ograditi. Ukoliko se stranke srbije ne okrenu pragmatičnoj analizi uzroka i posledica i prema takvim trezvenim saznanjima usmeru svoju politiku ići će Srbija u susret svome sunovratu i proliću krvi nej zanosnijih i naj većih mladih patriota.

Dušan Nonković

Terrorziel Europa – Das gefährliche Doppelspiel der Geheimdienste (Evropa cilj terora, opasna dupla igra tajnih službi)

BITTE WEITERMAILEN

Liebe Leserinnen und Leser,

ab 11. September 2008 ist in Deutschland mein neues Buch erhältlich:

Terrorziel Europa
Das gefährliche Doppelspiel der Geheimdienste

Es weist nach, daß an allen „islamistischen“ Anschlägen und
Anschlagsversuchen seit Mitte der 90er Jahre V-Leute und Maulwürfe der
Sicherheitsdienste beteiligt waren. Eine in dieser Form einzigartige
Enzyklopädie!

Es warnt, dass mit dieser Art von „inszeniertem Terror“ die aktuellen
Kriege – demnächst gegen Iran (McCains Krieg) oder Pakistan (Obamas Krieg) –
vorbereitet werden.

Potentielle Veranstalter von Lesungen und Podiumsdiskussionen – bitte
schnell melden.

Näheres zum Inhalt – siehe unten!

Buchpremieren werden stattfinden:

15. September – Wien
17. September – Berlin (20 Uhr, Festsaal Neues Deutschland)
26. September – Eisenach

Weitere Veranstaltungen in Vorbereitung!

Anfang September erscheint auch: Taschenbuchausgabe des lange vergriffenen
Bestsellers „Wie der Dschihad nach Europa kam. Gotteskrieger und
Geheimdienste auf dem Balkan“ (Verlag Kai Homilius, vorauss. 280 Seiten,
vorauss. 14.80 Euro); Buchpremiere – zusammen mit Autor Christoph Hörstel,
Pakistan-Experte – vermutlich am 9. September in Berlin, bei „Kostas“, Nähe
Savigny-Platz.

Weitere Informationen in Kürze!

Und: Beide Bücher gibt’s im Buchhandel – aber über Email
(info@juergen-elsaesser.de) natürlich auch direkt bei mir, auf Wunsch
signiert.

—————————————————————————

Jürgen Elsässer

Terrorziel Europa
Das gefährliche Doppelspiel der Geheimdienste

325 Seiten, 19.90 Euro
Residenz Verlag, St.Pölten/Wien
ISBN: 9783701731008
Erstverkaufstag Deutschland: 12. September 2008

Europa im Fadenkreuz: Seit dem verheerenden Bombenterror in Madrid (März
2004) und London (Juli 2005) vergeht kaum ein Monat, in dem die
Sicherheitsbehörden mindestens eines Landes nicht Großalarm auslösen. Die
Olympischen Spiele in Griechenland und die Fußball-WM in Deutschland wurden
mit einem Bürgerkriegsaufgebot an Polizei und Armee geschützt. Ein
islamistischer Anschlag mit einer schmutzigen Atombombe sei nur noch eine
Frage der Zeit, behaupten führende Politiker.

Doch eine genauere Analyse zeigt: Bei allen Anschlägen und
Anschlagsversuchen auf unserem Kontinent spielten Agenten westliche
Doppelagenten eine wichtige Rolle. Der islamische Fundamentalismus ist zwar
eine Realität. Doch sein terroristisches Potential ist eine Leihgabe vor
allem der US-amerikanischen und britischen Geheimdienste, die Europa auf
diese Weise immer tiefer in ihren weltweiten Krieg verstricken wollen. Mit
der Bedrohung durch Al Qaida werden außerdem immer weitgehendere Eingriffe
in unsere Freiheitsrechte gerechtfertigt. Ein totaler Überwachungsstaat wie
in George Orwells Buch 1984 ist keine böse Utopie mehr, sondern
Regierungsprogramm, zumindest in Großbritannien und Deutschland.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Die wichtigsten Akteure

Einleitung

1 Osama bin Laden und der Secret Service
Al Qaida ist von westlichen Geheimdienstleuten durchsetzt – bis an die
Spitze

2 Londonistan
Militante Prediger schufen mit Geheimdienst-Lizenz die wichtigste
Schaltzentrale des europäischen Dschihad

3 Das süddeutsche Netz
In einem Balkandörfchen trafen Mitte der neunziger Jahre die wichtigsten
Männer zusammen, die später in Mitteleuropa zum Dschihad antreten sollten
4 Eine maghrebinische Affäre
Paris: Eine Terrorwelle mit Geheimdiensthintergrund erschütterte 1995/1996
die Hauptstadt und den Norden Frankreichs

5 Alte Bekannte
Strasbourg: Bei der Planung eines Anschlages auf den Weihnachtsmarkt waren
Dilettanten und Desperados am Werk – aber nicht nur

6 Kein Pearl Harburg
Hamburg: Mohammed Atta hatte ein paar ganz unislamische Freunde

7 Der Mann, der zu viel wusste
Milano: Warum die CIA einen ihrer besten Mitarbeiter kidnappte

8 Aladin und die Wunderbomber
Istanbul: Ein Dreifach-Agent soll die Anschläge in der Bosporus-Metropole
finanziert – und die Attentäter des 11. September trainiert haben

9 Verraten und verkauft
Ulm: Martyrium und Mysterium des Khalid al Masri lassen viele Fragen offen

10 Terroristen und Agenten
Madrid: Die juristische Aufarbeitung der Anschläge vom 11. März 2004 weist
entscheidende Leerstellen auf

11 Im Geheimdienst Ihrer Majestät
London: Der mutmaßliche Drahtzieher der Bombenanschläge vom 7. Juli 2005 hat
im Auftrag des MI6 Dschihadkämpfer für das Kosovo rekrutiert

12 Ein Koffer voller Märchen
Köln: Die Spuren führen nach Tripoli – und nach Washington

13 Wenn V-Leute erzählen
Berlin und anderswo: Informanten der Polizei haben immer wieder Anschläge
vorhergesagt – oder mit vorbereitet

14 Das Gerücht eines Gerüchts
Wien: Die Erfindung einer „Al Qaida Österreich“ kommt trotz Bemühungen kaum
vom Fleck

15 Im Delirium eines deutschen 9/11
Oberschledorn: Die „Wasserstoffperoxydbomber“ taten ihr Möglichstes, um auf
sich aufmerksam zu machen

16 Das Netz der Gladiatoren
In vielen Nato-Staaten haben die USA während des Kalten Krieges einen
unkontrollierbaren Terror-Untergrund geschaffen

17 Big Brother marschiert
Der inszenierte Terror wird genutzt, um eine Geheime Datenpolizei zu
installieren

18 Die Putschisten
Deutschland ist auf dem Weg in eine Notstandsdiktatur

The Plight of the Bosnian Serbs

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3436

From the desk of John Laughland on Wed, 2008-07-23 15:15

The arrest of Radovan Karadzic in Serbia on Tuesday has provided yet another occasion for all the tired old propaganda about the Balkans wars to be taken out of the cupboard and given one last airing. In particular, the war is presented as one between a Serb aggressor and an innocent victim, the Bosnian Muslims, and the former is accused of practising genocide against the latter. Even if one accepts that crimes against humanity were committed during the Balkan wars, it should be obvious that both these claims are absurd.

First, the Serbs were no more the aggressors in the Bosnian civil war than Abraham Lincoln was an aggressor in the American Civil War. The Yugoslav army was in place all over Bosnia-Herzegovina because that republic was part of Yugoslavia. Bosnian Muslims (like Croats) left the army in droves and set up their own militia instead, as part of their drive for independence from Belgrade. This meant that the Yugoslav army lost its previous strongly multiethnic character and became largely Serb. It did not mean that Serb forces entered the territory of Bosnia, or even that the Serbs attacked the hapless Bosnian Muslims.

The accusation of aggression is intended to introduce by the back door an allegation which in fact has vanished from modern international criminal justice. Although the crime of waging an aggressive war was pronounced to be the supreme international crime at Nuremberg, it has been dropped from the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court for the former Yugoslavia which will presumably try Karadzic once he is extradited to The Hague, and even the new International Criminal Court (also in The Hague) does not for the time being have jurisdiction over it.

The accusation has the effect of condemning the Bosnian Serb war effort at its very origins (in terms of ius ad bellum) independently of any condemnation for the way the war was fought (ius in bello). In fact, the Bosnian Serb war effort was no more or less legitimate than the Bosnian Muslim war effort. The Muslims wanted to secede from Yugoslavia (and were egged on to do this by the Americans and the Europeans) while the Bosnian Serbs wanted to stay in Yugoslavia. It was as simple as that.

In my view, it is not possible to adjudicate such matters using the criminal law since, as political questions, they transcend it. But the fact that the Muslims blatantly cheated by holding the vote on an independence referendum at 3 a.m. after the Bosnian Serb deputies in the Bosnian parliament had all been told to go home, and the fact that the Bosnian Muslim president, Alija Izetbegovic, remained in office throughout 1992 long after his term had expired and long after he should have handed over to a Serb, meant that the Bosnian Serbs had excellent grounds for believing that the Bosnian Muslim secession was quite simply a coup d’état.

In any case, once the Muslims had seized power in Sarajevo, the Bosnian Serbs sought not to conquer the whole republic but instead simply to fight for the secession of their territories from Muslim control. Of course atrocities were committed against civilians during this period, especially ethnic cleansing. But the same phenomenon is observed, I believe, and by definition, in every single war in which a new state is created, whether it is the creation of Pakistan in 1947 or the creation in 1974 of what later became the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. If the Muslims had the right unilaterally to secede from Yugoslavia, why should the Bosnian Serbs not have had the right unilaterally to secede from the new state of Bosnia-Herzegovina which had never before existed and a state, and to which the Bosnian Serbs had no loyalty whatever?

Second, the Bosnian Serbs are accused (and two have been convicted) of committing genocide against the Bosnian Muslims in the massacre perpetrated at Srebrenica. Let us leave aside for a moment the Serb claims that the numbers of people killed in that summer of 1995 has been artificially inflated for propaganda purposes; let us also leave aside the undoubted fact that the Bosnian Muslims were using the UN safe haven of Srebrenica as a safe haven from which to conduct constant attacks against the Serb villages surrounding the town, during which many atrocities were committed against Serb civilians. (The commander of the Muslim forces, Nasir Oric, was released by the ICTY in February.)

What is clear is that the Srebrenica massacre cannot possibly be described as genocide. Even the most ardent pro-Muslim propagandists agree that the victims of the massacre there were all men. The Bosnian Serbs claim that they were combatants (although that is certainly not an excuse for killing them) but the point is that an army bent on genocide would precisely not have singled out men for execution but would have killed women too. The Srebrenica massacre may well have been a crime against humanity but it is impossible to see how it can be categorised as genocide.

Unfortunately, there is a very clear political reason why it has been so categorised. The Muslim president of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Haris Silaijdzic, said carefully on CNN the day Karadzic was captured that Karadzic’s trial was only the beginning of the process by which justice would be done in Bosnia. He said that there were hundreds of thousands of Muslims who had been ethnically cleansed by “Karadzic and Milosevic” and that their project therefore remained in force. The clear implication of what he was saying was this: if the very existence of the Bosnian Serb republic (the autonomous region within Bosnia carved out from the republic during the civil war) is found, in a court of law, to have been had as its president a man, Karadzic, who is convicted of genocide in the process of creating it, then its status would be illegitimate and it should be abolished. The Muslims continue to claim control over the whole of the territory of Bosnia-Herzegovina, while the Serbs merely want the preservation of their considerable autonomy within it.

In other words, far from bringing peace to the Balkans, it is quite possible that a conviction of Karadzic for genocide will reopen the Dayton settlement and egg the Muslims on to claim control over the Serb republic too. Under such circumstances, it is inevitable that the Bosnian Serbs would try to proclaim formal secession from Bosnia, just as the Kosovo Albanians did from Serbia.