
Filed under: AKTUELNO | Leave a comment »
Filed under: AKTUELNO | Leave a comment »
„Srbiji prijeti makroekonomska nestabilnost…“. To je novost stoljeca. Evropska Centralna Banka je, po rijecima Americkih financijera, povukla tepih ispod Americkog dolara. Dizanjem kamate, jaci euro ce imati prijednost u kupovini energenata, dok je nafta opet skocila do novih rekorda prevedeno na slabi dolar. U ovakvim globalnim poremecajima, Srbija nema kontrole. A osobito kada je Srbija za zadnjih osam godina provodila libralno kaptialisticke reforme privatizacija, za koje su vec svi znali da su BANKROTIRANE I PROPALE METODE ZAPADA. Cak je i MMF potvrdio da je liberalni kapitalizam mrtav. Prema tome, i Paja Patak moze danas biti na celu drzave, i samo gledati nemocno sto se desava. „Evropa“ niti SSP nece tu pomoci, nista, nula. Koliko lude propagande jos mogu Srbi progutati? A G17 jos ima hrabrost … da pita: Kako ce odbijanje ratifikacije SSP pomoci Kosovu. Gospodo iz G17, to je prilicno jasno i laiku. RAtificiarani SSP ima danas samo jednokratnu upotrebu za EU argumente u UN. Dok je Srbija bez vlade, i srlja u sve moguce probleme, EU se sepuri po hodnicima UN, ukazujuci na cinjenicu da je u Srbiji pobijedila pro-evropska koalicija, i da ce se sporazum ratificirati. A zasto im to treba? Generalni Sekretar ne moze tako lako uvaziti zahtjev EU da se UN povuce, i da se Kosovo prepusti Evropskoj vladavini. Srbija mora dati Generalnom Sekretaru kakvu-takvu potvrdu da se Srbija slaze sa gubitkom suvereniteta, jer u protivnom s tim se on ne moze sloziti. Gospodo iz G17, to vec i najmanja mikrodrzava u UN shvaca. Zato, nadam se da nitko iz krugova Predsjednika Tadica ne zmiga negdje iza ledja Srbije (kroz Gorana Svilanovica), dok se najopasnija bitka oko Kosova danas vodi, i dok se priblizava Juni 15. To je datum kada ce Kosovo staviti Ustav na snagu, i ukinuti ustavni okvir UNMIK-a, baziran na R. 1244 Kakva ce biti reakcija UN, a kakva u Srbiji? U Srbiji se o tome ni ne govori. Kostunica je OPET u pravu, dok Srbi jos spavaju.
Filed under: AKTUELNO | 2 Comments »
This is a momentous development, and not one in a hundred EU citizens, let alone non-EU visitors to Europe, are fully aware of its implications.
Those 32 offenses, according to the drafters of the Treaty, „if they are punishable in the issuing Member State by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years and as they are defined by the law of the issuing Member State, shall, under the terms of this Framework Decision and without verification of the double criminality of the act, give rise to surrender pursuant to a European arrest warrant.“
The list of 32 offenses includes criminal conspiracy, terrorism, human trafficking, child pornography, smuggling of drugs, weapons and explosives, fraud and money laundering, murder, kidnapping, forgery, etc. It also includes „racism and xenophobia,“ as well as „computer crime“ and „crimes under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.“ The local police will be obliged to arrest the indicted person and have him transferred to the issuing judge’s court for trial—and they will have to act regardless of their country’s judicial system or penal code.
Once the person is at the local court, he will be at the mercy of the local laws. The involvement of the ICC implies possible further extradition to non-EU countries. The Warrant is already in force in eight EU countries (Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom). An initial hearing takes place before a judge within 48 hours merely to establish the identity of the arrested (habeus corpus) and whether the arrest warrant has been filled in correctly. Additional information from the state that issued the arrest warrant may be requested. The major difference between extradition and EAW procedures is that the „hearing“ in the latter process does not consider the allegations against the defendant or examine evidence. Instead, the hearing is merely meant to satisfy the court that no „legal bars to surrender“ apply.
The European Arrest Warrant was one of the main topics at the recent Counter-Jihad Summit in Vienna, where the former Austrian Ambassador Edgar K. Selzer gave a detailed talk on the implications of this new weapon against freedom of speech in the EU. Dr. Selzer pointed out that the inclusion of „racism and xenophobia“ brings „an emotion, a sentiment“ into the category of major crimes, such as murder, arson etc, which is a legal and logical absurdity.
The European Arrest Warrant does not define „racism and xenophobia“ as such, but its drafters have relied on the European Commission’s „Framework Decision on combating racism and xenophobia“ which criminalizes „belief in race colour, descent, religion or belief, national or ethnic origin as a factor determining aversion to individuals.“ The Decision mandates that „racist and xenophobic behaviour must constitute an offence in all Member States and be punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties.“ This framework decision will apply to all „offences“ committed within the territory of the European Union, or „for the benefit of a legal person established in a Member State.“
The implications of all this are significant, for the future of civil liberties in the Western world no less than for me personally.
On May 11, I gave a speech at the Counter-Jihad Summit in Vienna. As our readers are well aware, „racism and xenophobia“ in the EU-speak have long included the nebulous thought-crime of „Islamophobia“—and my speech could be construed as paradigmatically „Islamophobic“ by the drafters of the EU Framework Decision, and accordingly acted upon by the future users of the European Arrest Warrant.
I am not an EU citizen, but that is immaterial if the „offence“ was committed in an EU member-country. Once the European Arrest Warrant is in force, a Muslim-friendly judge in, say, Leicester or Birmingham could issue a warrant for my arrest in Greece—where I often go during the summer— for the „offence“ committed by giving that speech in Austria last May, and the authorities in Thessaloniki or Athens would have to comply, no questions asked.
Furthermore, the speech was given at a gathering of 60 like-minded persons, most of them EU citizens. This constitutes a criminal conspiracy, a separate offense among those 32 crimes covered by the Warrant, since the Framework Decision defines a „racist or xenophobic group“ as „a structured organisation consisting of at least two persons established for a specific period.“ The speech was given to the Karl Martell Society, i.e. „for the benefit of a legal person established in a Member State.“
Last but not least, the said speech is widely available on the Internet, in both German and English, which potentially falls under the separate and as yet undefined offence of „computer crime.“ Such EAWs have been issued already by British judges to Dutch authorities demanding the surrender of a Danish citizen in a case involving pornography.
Interestingly, under the Framework Decision, anything that is said at a John Randolph Club conference here in the United States may be deemed illegal and actionable under the European Arrest Warrant, if the offending speech or statement is posted on a website (such as www.chroniclesmagazine.org) that is downloadable within the EU, or if some supposedly „racist and xenophobic“ material written by one of our editors or contributors is distributed by mailing Chronicles to a subscriber or an institution in the EU. This would be actionable under the Framework Decision as „public dissemination or distribution of tracts, pictures or other material containing expressions of racism and xenophobia,“ potentially subjecting the author to arrest in any EU country on a warrant issued by a judge in any other EU country.
Orwell was prescient but his date was wrong, a quarter-century premature.
Filed under: AKTUELNO, English | 2 Comments »
EVO ŽALBE NA OSNOVU KOJE JE PRIHVAĆENA PETICIJA PROTIV SECESIJE KOSOVA:
Deutscher Bundestag
Petitionsausschuss
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
Lübeck, 13.04.2008
Widerspruch zur Ablehnung der Petition
Begründung
Da Sie in Ihrer Begründung zur Ablehnung meiner Petition weder einen Paragrafen noch den Absatz der Satzung benannt haben, nach dem die Abweisung beschlossen wurde, betrachte ich Ihre Ablehnung als unbegründet.
Es wurden schwerwiegende Fehler der Deutschen Regierung und der ihr unterstellten Behörde begangen: beginnend mit der Waffenlieferung nach der Wiedervereinigung aus Beständen DDR, damals die sechst größte Armee der Welt, in Spannungs- und im Krieg befindliche Gebiete (Jugoslawien war damals zweifelfrei ein solches Gebiet), obwohl dies das Grundgesetz der BRD verbietet, bis hin zu der Beugung des internationalen Rechts mit der Anerkennung Kosovos gegen die Resolution 1244, obwohl die Führer des Kosovos Mitglieder einer terroristischen Organisation waren und die von Karla Del Ponte, wie sie in ihrem Buch schreibt, wegen Handel mit Organen von Gefangenen schwer belastet sind.
Ich appelliere noch einmal, meine Petitionsbeschwerde mit diesem Zusatz einer weiteren Bearbeitung zu zuleiten. Es soll niemand sagen können, er hätte nichts gewusst!
Dusan Nonkovic
TVOJIH PET MINUTA, NEČIJI CEO ŽIVOT
Pozivam svu Bracu i Sestre da potpisivanjem peticije protiv secesije Kosova, pomognu akciju Glasa Dijaspore.
Jedna od poznatih tekovina komunisticke srbofobije, jeste nametnuta drustvena konstanta po kojoj su Srbi oznaceni kao nekulturan i poluprimitivan narod, a Hrvati i Slovenci kao kulturni i prosveceni. Pri takvim nastojanjima, neizostavno se ukazuje i na istorijsku podlogu takve tvrdnje odnosno cinjenicu da su Srbi ( odnosno vecina njih ) vekovima bili pod turskim ropstvom a Hrvati i Slovenci pod vekovnom vlascu zapadnih drzava. Danas, poredeci nase i njihove pretke, sagledajmo da li je kulturniji jedan becki konjusar ili pak Srbin, koji cuvajuci Zavet svojih predaka, vodi borbu neprestanu protiv porobljivaca svog naroda i svojih Svetinja. Svakako je kulturniji ovaj drugi.
I zato,… ovoga puta Vas ne molim za donacije, ne trazim bilo kakva sponzorstva i novac za ugrozene…Trazim da pokazete da postojimo! Da nismo iscezli kao narod i da nam nije svejedno! Trazim da odvojite samo 5 minuta Vasega zivota i posaljete peticiju…, jer, Vasih pet minuta vratice mozda Srbiji zivot…Pokazimo da smo kulturniji i civilizovaniji od njih!
Oni nas bombama, mi njih peticijama!!!
Peticiju mozete poslati na vise nacina!
Obavezno naglasiti broj peticije: Pet. 3-16-05-08-035327
Primer teksta: Protestujem protiv secesije Kosova!
Putem poste:
Deutscher Bundestag
Petitionsausschuss
Platz der Republik 1
11011 Berlin
ili direktnim slanjem online formulara na sajtu Deutsche Bundestag-a, direktan link ovde:
http://www.bundestag.de/ausschuesse/a02/petition/index.asp
ili putem email-a:
ili putem faxa:
Fax: +49 (0)30 227 36053
Licno predlazem da zatrpamo i fax g-dje Angele Merkel:
Fax: 030 – 40 00 23 57
Saljite im sa posla, od kuce, iz Internet ili Call-centra, sa mobilnog…sa bilo kog mesta gde god se nalazili….samo im saljite, molim Vas! Hajde da im blokiramo sve linije gomilom peticija i pokazemo da postojimo i da smo protiv okupacije!
Srbija nije samo Kosovo, nije ni Beograd…Srbija sam ja,.. i ti, ..svi mi, ma gde se nalazili. Budimo konacno GLAS Srbije! Povedite kampanju za svoju zemlju i budite propaganda koju Srbija nema, a koju ce Evropu da pomeri sa mesta! Budite GLAS DIJASPORE!
Besplatno je!
Sasa J. Miskovic
Filed under: AKTUELNO, Немачки-Deutsch, English, Literatura | Leave a comment »